🚀 go-pugleaf

ell@access1.digex.net (Ell) wrote:

[snip]
>
>I think the tendency to go with a paradigm which appeals to the intuitive
>understanding of the intellect.  There is something significant there that
>can be of vital importance, and value to computer science and software
>engineering, imo.  It is this intellectual appeal, which underlies the
>desire, and advice to embed, and layer OOA (most recently Rumbaugh in
>JOOP, but also Booch and Jacobson from the past) as the primary
>orientation of OOD.
>
[snip]

Excuse me, but what the hell are you trying say?  The first sentence
is a real beauty, sort of like you got lost...  Drivel, drivel,
drivel.  Politicians could learn a lot from you.  The whole trouble
with expounders of Methodology A, Methodology B, etc. is that they get
tied up in the methodology, and forget that projects require tangible
results in a defined time scale (often very short).  When you give an
application to an end user, do you think they care if it was designed
with structured methods, OOD, etc.?