Article View: comp.lang.fortran
Article #4444FORTRAN CM
From: Francis Muir
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1991 23:52
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1991 23:52
6 lines
733 bytes
733 bytes
FORTRAN CM - Thinking Machines' high-level language for the CM2 (front- ended by a SUN4) - has been described as a supersubset of FORTRAN 90. Is this a fair description? Where do these languages significantly diverge? The pre-compiler directives, such as CMF$ LAYOUT, are super, what is sub? Fido
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun30.235227.10714@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: francis@hanauma.Stanford.EDU (Francis Muir) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: FORTRAN CM Message-ID: <1991Jun30.235227.10714@leland.Stanford.EDU> Date: 30 Jun 91 23:52:27 GMT Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Lines: 6