Re: Fortran to C

Article View: comp.lang.fortran

Article #4642

#4642

From: Dave Love
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 15:03

7 lines
862 bytes

>>>>> On 12 Apr 1996 15:06:01 +0200, marin@posta.unizar.es (Jose Luis Marin Espa/ol) said:

 Jose>    Wouldn't 'f2c' from att (netlib) be your choice? 

Not on its own.  There is an add-on on the NAG site somewhere
(http://www.nag.co.uk) which will help produce maintanable C.  Better
to keep the Fortran, of course <1/2 :-).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <rzq7mvh8r6t.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!yama.mcc.ac.uk!keele!daresbury!usenet

References: <4kjvm6$ghc@saturn.sdsu.edu> <4klkfp$trh@posta.unizar.es>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!yama.mcc.ac.uk!keele!daresbury!usenet
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Fortran to C
Date: 15 Apr 1996 16:03:54 +0100
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
Sender: fx@djlvig.dl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <rzq7mvh8r6t.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <4kjvm6$ghc@saturn.sdsu.edu> <4klkfp$trh@posta.unizar.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: djlvig.dl.ac.uk
In-reply-to: marin@posta.unizar.es's message of 12 Apr 1996 15:06:01 +0200
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1

Reply to Parent Message