🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.fortran
Article #6454

Differences Among Languages For Number Crunching?

#6454
From: ndeng
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 1990 19:55
23 lines
1538 bytes
I have a question about which language is the "best" for scientific 
computation (read: number crunching), especially for execution speed.
A majority of people use FORTRAN, not because this language is good or
flexible, but due to historical reasons. Some others use C or Pascal,
which offer better system interaction and graphics support. There is 
also a group of people who still use BASIC or ALGOL. I wonder if anybody
has used two or more different languages to solve an identical problem
and compared the results for speed/accuracy differences. Do the C/Pascal/BASIC
version of LINPACK or Livermore Bunchmarks exist?  How about the speed 
of these bunchmarks when compared with FORTRAN version? I think this
would be a topic of general interest and would like to see discussions.

I apologize if this topic has been discussed before. (In that case, would
somebody be kind enough to give me some hints for whereabout of the 
discussion archives?) And also, please no flames, I am not trying to compare
apples and oranges. If I get enough responses by e-mail, I'll post a
summary. 

N. Deng
ndeng@euler.berkeley.edu
-----------------------------
Standard Disclaimer Applies.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9003021955.AA28721@euler.Berkeley.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EULER.BERKELEY.EDU!ndeng

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EULER.BERKELEY.EDU!ndeng
From: ndeng@EULER.BERKELEY.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Differences Among Languages For Number Crunching?
Message-ID: <9003021955.AA28721@euler.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 2 Mar 90 19:55:04 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 23