Re: Implied do-loop statement, for the next FORTRAN?

Article View: comp.lang.fortran

Article #6464

#6464

From: David desJardins
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 00:05

12 lines
710 bytes

From article <14259@lambda.UUCP>, by jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles):
> Why not just overload
> the multiply operator on MATRIX type variables and say:
> 
>          C = A*B
> 
> and declare A, B, and C as type MATRIX?

   Because this is already meaningful and does pointwise
multiplication.

   -- David desJardins

Technical Details

Message-ID: <640@idacrd.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!aplcen!haven!udel!princeton!idacrd!desj

References: <14259@lambda.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!aplcen!haven!udel!princeton!idacrd!desj
From: desj@idacrd.UUCP (David desJardins)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Implied do-loop statement, for the next FORTRAN?
Message-ID: <640@idacrd.UUCP>
Date: 6 Mar 90 00:05:51 GMT
References: <14259@lambda.UUCP>
Organization: idacrd, princeton, nj
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message