Article View: comp.lang.fortran
Article #6568Re: OT: Intel/DVF Advertisements
From: mbbr
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:37
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:37
58 lines
3542 bytes
3542 bytes
Kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and tholed: > John Harper writes: > > >> tbwright@cantv.net wrote: > > >>> I still use a 1985 MS F77 which has no known bugs. > > >> Try > >> > >> ISTEP = 15 > >> DO I=-90,90,ISTEP > >> WRITE (*,*) I > >> END DO > >> > >> That produced no output in Microsoft's "GSA Certified as Correct > >> and Complete" FORTRAN 77 compiler. > > > That program has no END statement. > > Of course not; it's a code fragment. Worked fine if the ISTEP What USTEP is irrelevant, Dickless. > variable was replaced with the constant 15 in the DO statement, > but it couldn't handle a variable step size. Sort of like you can't handle antagonism eh, Dickless? > > Did MS F77 fail to find that error, > > It's not an error, given that it's just a code fragment. Just like your fragment eh, Dickless? > > or did Tholen inadvertently omit the END, > > The omission wasn't inadvertent; I intended to reproduce just a > code fragment. On what basis do you make that k'lame, Dickless? > > and intend to tell us that > > when it's put in, MS F77 won't write anything at run-time? > > I already told you that it produced no output. Much like you eh, Dickless? > > MS F77 is not one of the compilers I can use, but I sometimes test > > those compilers on programs known to have caused trouble, both bad > > programs with undetected errors and good programs that won't work. > > I would like to know which kind of program this one was meant to be. > > It's not a bad program; it's not a good program; it's a good code > fragment. If it doesn't work, Dickless, how can it be good?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1152203842.460132.137730@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<WoApg.33038$VE1.17849@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <1152053975.598966.106790@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <XcDqg.12249$MF6.7943@tornado.socal.rr.com> <1152067928.113970@bats.mcs.vuw.ac.nz> <xNLqg.24410$uy3.18465@tornado.socal.rr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,381f9c85448c0e6a X-Google-Thread: 102c26,270ca17cf2290012 X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,270ca17cf2290012 X-Google-Thread: 1156f6,270ca17cf2290012 X-Google-Thread: 106284,65b6ed37bbbe0a2d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,gid102c26,gid1138ec,gid1156f6,gid106284,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: mbbr@mighty.co.za Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell Subject: Re: OT: Intel/DVF Advertisements Followup-To: comp.lang.fortran,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell,triangle.general,soc.men,ne.weather Date: 6 Jul 2006 09:37:22 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 59 Message-ID: <1152203842.460132.137730@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> References: <WoApg.33038$VE1.17849@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <1152053975.598966.106790@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <XcDqg.12249$MF6.7943@tornado.socal.rr.com> <1152067928.113970@bats.mcs.vuw.ac.nz> <xNLqg.24410$uy3.18465@tornado.socal.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.211.117.172 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1152203847 18553 127.0.0.1 (6 Jul 2006 16:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <xNLqg.24410$uy3.18465@tornado.socal.rr.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.211.117.172; posting-account=gfDFhQ0AAAD-2SlsgA4JCYtc0KAvRvTc