🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #1159

Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?

#1159
From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:29
23 lines
2502 bytes
Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:

> In comp.lang.forth Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> lisp syntax does not use operators, or rather, it primarily relies on
>> one single match-fix operator the parenthesis. And as a match-fix
>> operator, the word ?pre-fix? doesn't make much sense because that word
>> is primarly for operators used in a linear (none nested) way.
>> 
>> for detail, see:
>> 
>> ?The Concepts and Confusions of Prefix, Infix, Postfix and Fully
>> Nested Notations?
>> http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/notations.html
>
> Given that the article even manages to confuse Polish notation and
> Reverse Polish notation, I strongly recommend that everyone avoid it.

As most of what he writes...

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <87ipy3dooh.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <80ceeca0-1d32-47d1-ba96-feb4d9729c3a@v17g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <e37b64b7-61ba-4247-a6cd-e32323c7be15@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <veSdnaWbJ-7kB7nQnZ2dnUVZ7rOdnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: ee3de009bc,1641de092071599d
X-Google-Attributes: gidee3de009bc,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional,comp.lang.lisp,gnu.emacs.help,comp.lang.forth,comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:29:50 +0100
Organization: Informatimago
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <87ipy3dooh.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>
References: <80ceeca0-1d32-47d1-ba96-feb4d9729c3a@v17g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
 <e37b64b7-61ba-4247-a6cd-e32323c7be15@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <veSdnaWbJ-7kB7nQnZ2dnUVZ7rOdnZ2d@supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: individual.net jlsS1HpZR5sgGKdCqUTwNg08+YR/VS+C6XLslxyXkfzEGw8RJm
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZWEwN2MzMWQ4YTFmZWM2YTQwMjI3MDYzOWU5NTVhODJiYWQ2OTc0ZA== sha1:c22ynhe5z1JO40SJEbo5drMmhGM=
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA
      oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9
      033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac
      l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR
      mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
X-Accept-Language:         fr, es, en
X-Disabled: X-No-Archive: no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)