Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #1229Re: GPL isn't what we thought it was? (was: Re: What functional langs? (Licenses))
From: Fergus Henderson
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00
16 lines
1483 bytes
1483 bytes
Zane Lewkowicz <zooko@xs4all.nl> writes: >I suspect (but I Am Not A Lawyer) that you can dynamically link >GPL'ed source code against proprietary source code while still >remaining within the bounds of the law. There are some cases where this is certainly true, and some cases where it is certainly false. There are also some gray areas. But if you want to discuss technical details of the GPL, please do so on gnu.misc.discuss rather than on comp.lang.functional. -- Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<706n4i$b80$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<360DD493.8994F4FE@realware.com.au> <kbvhlwmql8.fsf_-_@haskell.systemsz.cs.yale.edu> <6vou1t$q89$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <6vsnrt$irn$1@info.noc.demon.net> <706duh$q9a$1@xs1.xs4all.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107f24,511e2609df755b2b X-Google-Attributes: gid107f24,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5170f7e3c4604e85,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: GPL isn't what we thought it was? (was: Re: What functional langs? (Licenses)) Date: 1998/10/16 Message-ID: <706n4i$b80$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> X-Deja-AN: 401649465 References: <360DD493.8994F4FE@realware.com.au> <kbvhlwmql8.fsf_-_@haskell.systemsz.cs.yale.edu> <6vou1t$q89$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <6vsnrt$irn$1@info.noc.demon.net> <706duh$q9a$1@xs1.xs4all.nl> Organization: Computer Science, The University of Melbourne Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional,gnu.misc.discuss