🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #254

Re: Is Lisp in class X?

#254
From: Chris Dollin
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 1990 07:19
17 lines
1291 bytes
Jeff Dalton says:

   I would not say Pop got it right, because (1) variables in Pop have
   dynamic scope and (2) closures have to have an explicit annotation
   listing the variables to close over [cf FUNCTION in Lisp 1.5].  I
   regard these as more significant defects.

Older Pop didn't get it right, tis true. However, current versions of Pop11
(Aaron can supply dates - lest's just say for at least a couple of years)
have had full lexical scoping - ie non-dynamic scope and implicit closures.

I, too, would regard their absence as a significant defect. Conversely, I
regard the explict presence of partial application ("consclosure") as a +ve 
feature.

Regards, Kers.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <KERS.90Jun4081950@cdollin.hpl.hp.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!cdollin!kers
References: <14810@dime.cs.umass.edu> <2632@skye.ed.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!cdollin!kers
From: kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Chris Dollin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Is Lisp in class X?
Message-ID: <KERS.90Jun4081950@cdollin.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 4 Jun 90 07:19:50 GMT
References: <14810@dime.cs.umass.edu> <2632@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: news@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Usenet News Administrator)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Lines: 17
In-Reply-To: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk's message of 3 Jun 90 17:10:00 GMT