Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #254Re: Is Lisp in class X?
From: Chris Dollin
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 1990 07:19
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 1990 07:19
17 lines
1291 bytes
1291 bytes
Jeff Dalton says:
I would not say Pop got it right, because (1) variables in Pop have
dynamic scope and (2) closures have to have an explicit annotation
listing the variables to close over [cf FUNCTION in Lisp 1.5]. I
regard these as more significant defects.
Older Pop didn't get it right, tis true. However, current versions of Pop11
(Aaron can supply dates - lest's just say for at least a couple of years)
have had full lexical scoping - ie non-dynamic scope and implicit closures.
I, too, would regard their absence as a significant defect. Conversely, I
regard the explict presence of partial application ("consclosure") as a +ve
feature.
Regards, Kers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<KERS.90Jun4081950@cdollin.hpl.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!cdollin!kersReferences:
<14810@dime.cs.umass.edu> <2632@skye.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!cdollin!kers From: kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Chris Dollin) Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional Subject: Re: Is Lisp in class X? Message-ID: <KERS.90Jun4081950@cdollin.hpl.hp.com> Date: 4 Jun 90 07:19:50 GMT References: <14810@dime.cs.umass.edu> <2632@skye.ed.ac.uk> Sender: news@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Usenet News Administrator) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK. Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk's message of 3 Jun 90 17:10:00 GMT