🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <15329@dime.cs.umass.edu> pop@cs.umass.edu () writes:
>It should be noted that the "tuples", referred to in in the POP-2 manual
>are NOT items, as used in the technical sense of that manual. I.e. they
>do not have the status accorded to items in the "Items Charter of
>Rights" [Popplestone 1968] (e.g. they cannot be the value of variables),
>but instead are sequences of values existing on the open stack. 

>Popplestone R.J.[1968] "The Design Philosophy of POP-2",
> Machine Intelligence 3, (Ed.D.Michie) Edinburgh University Press.

Pop --

A while ago, I was trying to trace back the "Bill of Rights" idea
and got as far as "The Design Philosophy of POP-2".  I was wondering
if the idea had any earlier history.  I've tried asking various people
here at Ed, but now that we have you on the net...

Jeff Dalton,                      JANET: J.Dalton@uk.ac.ed             
AI Applications Institute,        ARPA:  J.Dalton%uk.ac.ed@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Edinburgh University.             UUCP:  ...!ukc!ed.ac.uk!J.Dalton