Re: PD SML?

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #352

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#352

From: Nick Rothwell
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 1990 15:39

16 lines
1254 bytes

In article <43283@cornell.UUCP>, murthy@algron (Chet Murthy) writes:
>But even though it costs thousands of dollars, AT&T is putting it into
>the copylefted domain.  Not the public domain, where anybody and her
>brother can steal it, but certainly available to anybody that wants
>it.

I don't think the NJ SML licence is pure copyleft (or pure PD?), to be
honest. It's not copyleft because you *can*, I think, take it and sell
it, as long as you don't mention AT&T's name.

		Nick.
--
Nick Rothwell,	Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh.
		nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk    <Atlantic Ocean>!mcsun!ukc!lfcs!nick
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
		   Ich weiss jetzt was kein Engel weiss

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5184@castle.ed.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!rutgers!usc!jarthur!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!lfcs!nick

References: <23308@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <2646@bruce.cs.monash.OZ.AU> <43283@cornell.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!rutgers!usc!jarthur!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!lfcs!nick
From: nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: PD SML?
Message-ID: <5184@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 16 Jul 90 15:39:06 GMT
References: <23308@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <2646@bruce.cs.monash.OZ.AU> <43283@cornell.UUCP>
Reply-To: nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell)
Organization: Wavetables 'R' Us
Lines: 16
In-reply-to: murthy@algron.cs.cornell.edu (Chet Murthy)

Reply to Parent Message