Re: Why functional languages?

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #591

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#591

From: Annius Groenink
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:02

15 lines
1098 bytes

tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (Thomas M. Breuel) writes:


>I think in order to fulfill their promise in this area, functional
>programming languages should probably go back to Lisp notation.

(I
  (Don (' (t
	     (think
		   (so)))))) (!).
-- 
Annius Victor Groenink      Universiteit Utrecht      PTT Research Leidschendam
Mathematics/Comp. Sc.        avgroeni@cs.ruu.nl       +31 70 3325445 (weekdays)
Atari ST/Music          A.V.Groenink@research.ptt.nl  +31 70 3464732 (evenings)
_____________My opinions are my opinions____________  +31 5700 29396 (weekends)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <annius.717696151@freyr>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!spider.research.ptt.nl!freyr!annius

References: <1992Sep26.212935.26809@eng.umd.edu> <1992Sep28.120225.9524@odin.diku.dk> <TMB.92Sep28144424@arolla.idiap.ch>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!spider.research.ptt.nl!freyr!annius
From: annius@sif.research.ptt.nl (Annius Groenink)
Subject: Re: Why functional languages?
Message-ID: <annius.717696151@freyr>
Sender: usenet@spider.research.ptt.nl (USEnet News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: sif.research.ptt.nl
Organization: PTT Research
References: <1992Sep26.212935.26809@eng.umd.edu> <1992Sep28.120225.9524@odin.diku.dk> <TMB.92Sep28144424@arolla.idiap.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:02:31 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message