🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #645

Re: Why functional languages?

#645
From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 02:52
11 lines
1108 bytes
In article <farrell.718241256@coral> farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell) writes:

>   It seems to me that a syntax error in Lisp is very hard to make, as so long
> as you have the right number of brackets, everything is a valid program. The
> ability to make syntax errors is a virtue.

Well, no; it's easy to make syntax errors in Lisp.  It's just that if you're
running in interpreted mode, they aren't caught until you try to execute.
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <23802@alice.att.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
References: <annius.717696151@freyr> <TMB.92Sep28223555@arolla.idiap.ch> <26463@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Oct2.053333.20373@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <farrell.718241256@coral>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Why functional languages?
Message-ID: <23802@alice.att.com>
Date: 5 Oct 92 02:52:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.23802
References: <annius.717696151@freyr> <TMB.92Sep28223555@arolla.idiap.ch> <26463@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Oct2.053333.20373@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <farrell.718241256@coral>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 11