Re: Why curry? (Re: Why functional languages?)

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #677

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#677

From: Glenn Bruns
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 11:31

8 lines
798 bytes

I'm not clear about what I should conclude about New Jersey ML from
this thread.  Will the use of tupled function definitions in
NJML generally result in better efficiency?

-- 
Glenn Bruns
Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science
University of Edinburgh

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bvuqox.v8@dcs.ed.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!bruns

References:

<annius.717696151@freyr> <TMB.92Oct7181835@arolla.idiap.ch> <1992Oct8.124228.10449@kth.se> <1b1f3pINNde6@early-bird.think.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!bruns
From: bruns@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Glenn Bruns)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Why curry? (Re: Why functional languages?)
Message-ID: <Bvuqox.v8@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 9 Oct 92 11:31:44 GMT
References: <annius.717696151@freyr> <TMB.92Oct7181835@arolla.idiap.ch> <1992Oct8.124228.10449@kth.se> <1b1f3pINNde6@early-bird.think.com>
Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message