Re: are there functional language benchmarks?

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #722

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#722

From: Alwyn Goodloe
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 1990 16:59

14 lines
1091 bytes

     Dear net readers I know that this has been asked before but I have never
seen any responses posted. I am compiling a list of functional languages 
available for the PC (DOS or 386 UNIX). So far the list is vary short its'
contents are several dialicts of LISP, PC HOPE and the recently announced 
RUFL. Does anyone know of others. I am sure that several of the larger 
UNIX based languages such as SML NJ could eaisly be ported to UNIX 386 
based systems, has anyone tried?




                                               Alwyn E. Goodloe
                                            agoodloe@gmuvax2.gmu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3179@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!umbc3!gmuvax2!agoodloe

References: <9956@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!umbc3!gmuvax2!agoodloe
From: agoodloe@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Alwyn Goodloe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: are there functional language benchmarks?
Message-ID: <3179@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
Date: 31 Dec 90 16:59:54 GMT
References: <9956@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: agoodloe@gmuvax2.UUCP (Alwyn Goodloe)
Organization: George Mason Univ. Fairfax, Va.
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message