Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #73Re: algorithmic efficiency and lazy languages
From: D.A.Turner
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 15:36
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 15:36
22 lines
1586 bytes
1586 bytes
In article <DTARDITI.92Jul21023549@DESERT.FOX.CS.CMU.EDU> dtarditi@CS.CMU.EDU (David Tarditi) writes: >I have always been under the impression that lazy evaluation >makes it difficult to determine the time and space efficiency >of programs. > >If this is true, then it is a strong practical argument against using >lazy evaluation, since asymptotic efficiency is quite important in >practice. An O(n^2) algorithm may be unusable in practice, while >an O(n log n) algorithm may do quite nicely. I think it is only half true. There is no special difficulty in reasoning about the *time* complexity of programs written in a non-strict functional language. One can derive from the program equations for functions fi say, similar equations for Tfi, the time-to-execute of function fi. There is quite a nice discussion of this, with some examples, in chapter 6 of Bird and Wadler's "Introduction to Functional Programming". On the other hand reasoning about the *space* complexity of such programs seems to be much more difficult. David Turner
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<501@owl.ukc.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!harrier.ukc.ac.uk!owl.ukc.ac.uk!datReferences:
<DTARDITI.92Jul21023549@DESERT.FOX.CS.CMU.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!harrier.ukc.ac.uk!owl.ukc.ac.uk!dat From: dat@ukc.ac.uk (D.A.Turner) Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional Subject: Re: algorithmic efficiency and lazy languages Message-ID: <501@owl.ukc.ac.uk> Date: 23 Jul 92 15:36:00 GMT References: <DTARDITI.92Jul21023549@DESERT.FOX.CS.CMU.EDU> Reply-To: dat@ukc.ac.uk (D.A.Turner) Distribution: comp Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. Lines: 22