Re: Views revisited

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #805

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#805

From: Rob Turner
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 1991 17:34

7 lines
587 bytes

From the example given, "views" look enormously like algebraic
specifications of abstract data types.

Is this correct? Is this another instance of inventing a new name for
something which already exists, in order to confuse everyone?

Rob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <17992.9102181734@olympus.cs.hull.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shelby!agate!ucbvax!cs.hull.ac.uk!rst

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shelby!agate!ucbvax!cs.hull.ac.uk!rst
From: rst@cs.hull.ac.uk (Rob Turner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Views revisited
Message-ID: <17992.9102181734@olympus.cs.hull.ac.uk>
Date: 18 Feb 91 17:34:33 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 7