🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.functional
Article #88

Re: ** LAZY LANGUAGES FASTER?? **

#88
From: Karl-Filip Faxen
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:07
17 lines
1431 bytes
In article <3737@svin02.info.win.tue.nl>, erik@wsinfo03.win.tue.nl (Erik Poll) writes:

|> In lazy languages, an argument is evaluated once for every time that it 
|> is used. 

No, in a lazy implementation (and laziness is an implementation related
concept - the corresponding semantic concept is nonstrictness (as Nikhil
pointed out earlier)) an argument to a function is evaluated *at most once*.
A lazy implementation is required to save the result of evaluation for 
later use. What *has* to be done for each use of the argument (in the
absence of strictness analysis) is a check of whether the argument is or
isn't already evaluated, ie if we should evaluate it or use the saved 
result of an earlier evaluation.

Karl-Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Make the frequent case fast, and the fast case frequent!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul27.130709.13348@kth.se>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dentex.tds.kth.se!kff
References: <1992Jul24.134857.23289@gdstech.grumman.com> <3737@svin02.info.win.tue.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dentex.tds.kth.se!kff
From: kff@dentex.tds.kth.se (Karl-Filip Faxen)
Subject: Re: ** LAZY LANGUAGES FASTER?? **
Message-ID: <1992Jul27.130709.13348@kth.se>
Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dentex.tds.kth.se
Reply-To: kff@dentex.tds.kth.se (Karl-Filip Faxen)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
References: <1992Jul24.134857.23289@gdstech.grumman.com> <3737@svin02.info.win.tue.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:07:09 GMT
Lines: 17