Re: Is Miranda the one?

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #940

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#940

From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1992 14:10

9 lines
722 bytes

In article <dt4.723949863@persimmon> dt4@persimmon.ucsb.edu (David E. Goggin) writes:

> I am wondering whether everyone out there
> believers that Miranda is the BEST functional language?

Best for what purpose?
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <24378@alice.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!laidbak!tellab5!mcdchg!att!att!allegra!alice!ark

References: <dt4.723949863@persimmon>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!laidbak!tellab5!mcdchg!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Is Miranda the one?
Message-ID: <24378@alice.att.com>
Date: 10 Dec 92 14:10:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.24378
References: <dt4.723949863@persimmon>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Distribution: comp
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message