🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.lang.functional
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Bruce MacLennan Wed, 27 Feb 1991 16:53
origin of lambda symbol
#827
Author: Bruce MacLennan
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 1991 16:53
53 lines
2794 bytes
> From: jhf@chaco.c3.lanl.gov (Joe Fasel)
 . . . . .
> Hi, Bruce.
> 
> The following query was posted to comp.lang.functional recently:
> 
> | From: ddr@margaux.inria.fr (Daniel de Rauglaudre)
 . . . . .
> | There is a question of great importance in our institute: why "lambda"
> | in "lambda calculus" ? Why not "alpha" or "dzeta" or any other symbol ?
> | Does anybody know the origin of this choice ? Thank you for you answers.
> |
> |         Daniel de Rauglaudre
> |         INRIA - France
> |         ddr@inria.inria.fr
> 
> I recall that you got the answer straight from the horse's mouth at the
> 82 LFP conference.  I think I remember the gist of it, but I might get
> the details wrong, so I wonder if you could relate the story to us.
> 
> Thanks.  I hope all is going well for you and your family.
> 
> --Joe

At the 1982 LISP and Functional Programming Conference I asked
Alonzo Church about the origin of the lambda symbol.  What I found out
is briefly summarized in a footnote on p. 357 of my book
"Functional Programming:  Practice and Theory" (Addison Wesley,
1990).  Since Church never confirmed the story in writing, I
thought it was inappropriate to attribute it to him in my book.
Nevertheless, here is the history of the lambda symbol, based 
on the notes I wrote down after my conversation.

Church said that the starting point was Russell and Whitehead's
abstraction operator (in Principia Mathematica), which they wrote
with a caret over the bound variable:  $\hat{x}(x^2+1)$.  To facilitate
mechanical manipulation of the bound variables, he began to write
the caret in front of the bound variable (because, I presume, this
made the abstraction a string rather than a two-dimensional structure):
$\hat{}x(x^2+1)$.  From there the caret symbol evolved into an
uppercase lambda, $\Lambda x(x^2+1)$, and finally a lower case lambda,
$\lambda x(x^2+1)$.  I presume the latter stages of this evolution
were under the pressure of writing convenience and to avoid confusion
with other symbols (such as the and-sign).

Bruce MacLennan
Department of Computer Science
107 Ayres Hall
The University of Tennessee
Knoxville, TN 37996-1301

(615)974-0994/5067
maclennan@cs.utk.edu
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads