Thread View: comp.lang.java.beans
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Wolfgang Keupp
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00
WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS)
Author: Wolfgang Keupp
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00
17 lines
1566 bytes
1566 bytes
Did you see that on the JavaLobby? Cheers, Wolfgang | | Coining a new term: WORMS | | Posted by Lou Grinzo, 15 Jun | | | I suggest we refer to all Java code that relies on | MS-specific extensions as | WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS). | | Lou |
Re: WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS)
Author: Andrew Weiland
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00
25 lines
1712 bytes
1712 bytes
like anything written with J++ for example. Wolfgang Keupp <wolfgang.keupp@gmx.de> wrote in message news:3766BF92.D6FB3DE7@gmx.de... > Did you see that on the JavaLobby? > > Cheers, > Wolfgang > > | > | Coining a new term: WORMS > | > | Posted by Lou Grinzo, 15 Jun > | > | > | I suggest we refer to all Java code that relies on > | MS-specific extensions as > | WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS). > | > | Lou > | > > >
Re: WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS)
Author: Chris Scaife
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:00
11 lines
1714 bytes
1714 bytes
>> | I suggest we refer to all Java code that relies on >> | MS-specific extensions as >> | WORMS (Write Once, Run [on] MS). Not bad, but misleading. In my experience, anything you write for MS platform will be incompatible with the next (sub) release of windows and need re-writing. My advise: Don't waste your time or money with the latest crap from MS and never buy an upgrade unless you are prepared to "upgrade" everything else.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads