Article View: comp.lang.java.corba
Article #42Re: JDK 1.3 ORB and visibroker 4.5.1 (Can they work together??)
From: Morris Luk
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:28
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:28
43 lines
3199 bytes
3199 bytes
Thanks for your writing. But my question is about the issues I'm having with the use of two ORBs from different vendors and they don't communicate very well. I'm not trying to find out what version of jdk visibroker 4.5.1 is supporting when you run your services written in java on it. Summing up, it's the following: JDK 1.3 ORB <--------- X --------------> Visibroker 4.5.1 ORB (client side) (server side) the two ORBs don't talk very well. I would like to know if there is a solution. Or I definitely have to use visibroker 4.5.1 on both ends. I hope this can clarify more. Thanks. "Max" <laimj@sohu.com> wrote in message news:<a939vr$anr$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>... > I used to use visibroker 4.0, and found it couldn't work with jdk 1.3. After > I changed to jdk 1.1, everything was ok. > Then I read the documents about visibroker, they just announced the version > only tested on some specific jdk veriosn. > > Try an older version of jdk. And good luck. > > "Morris Luk" <morris_luk@my-deja.com> wrote in message > news:e3ccc19b.0204100756.4dbb6a9d@posting.google.com... > > Hi: > > > > I'm trying to use the ORB in JDK 1.3.1 in my front end to talk to my > > backend services which use visibroker 4.5.1. I got no success. I > > checked the sun website and they said their ORB is CORBA 2.3 compliant > > in some areas but of course it means not all CORBA 2.3 compliant in > > another way. Visibroker 4.5.1 is CORBA 2.3 compliant. I think > > visibroker is backward compactible to older CORBA spec. So I'm not > > sure if the reason for not working was I did not do things right or > > the two different ORBs really can't work together. > > > > If you had success in making the two work, I appreciate if you can let > > me know and the best if you could share some sample code with me. > > > > Thanks in advance.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e3ccc19b.0204111128.7752c6b8@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<e3ccc19b.0204100756.4dbb6a9d@posting.google.com> <a939vr$anr$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108bbb,252224dee2af2290 X-Google-Attributes: gid108bbb,public X-Google-Thread: 10661c,252224dee2af2290 X-Google-Attributes: gid10661c,public X-Google-Thread: 109156,252224dee2af2290 X-Google-Attributes: gid109156,public X-Google-Thread: f753e,252224dee2af2290 X-Google-Attributes: gidf753e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-11 12:36:26 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: morris_luk@my-deja.com (Morris Luk) Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.corba,inprise.public.visibroker,borland.public.visibroker,comp.object.corba Subject: Re: JDK 1.3 ORB and visibroker 4.5.1 (Can they work together??) Date: 11 Apr 2002 12:28:01 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 43 Message-ID: <e3ccc19b.0204111128.7752c6b8@posting.google.com> References: <e3ccc19b.0204100756.4dbb6a9d@posting.google.com> <a939vr$anr$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.181.240.133 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018553282 19352 127.0.0.1 (11 Apr 2002 19:28:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2002 19:28:02 GMT