🚀 go-pugleaf

I would like all the folks that replied to this one and solve this scenario.
The gentlemen that originally posted had a good point... here goes...

If my applet implements custom events and requires access to the system
event queue this causes a security breach. Does this breach not require us
to have the applet signed in order to properly run within the browser ?

Also, with SUN's signing model, how do i specifically allocate privileges to
print ? or are these privileges blanketed and allowed ??? VJ++ 6.0 permits
us to allocate specific privileges.

Also is Microsoft's CAB file usable with the JAVA plugin ? Are all the HTML
tags CABBASE, CODEBASE, ARCHIVE all usable with all the signing methologies?

My swing applet cannot run because it access the system event queue.


Thanks

I also get the following host exception...

java.net.UnknownHostException: F

 at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Compiled Code)

 at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName0(Compiled Code)

 at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(Compiled Code)

 at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:97)

 at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:62)

 at sun.net.NetworkClient.openServer(NetworkClient.java:50)

 at sun.net.ftp.FtpClient.openServer(FtpClient.java:200)

 at sun.net.ftp.FtpClient.<init>(FtpClient.java:314)

 at
sun.net.www.protocol.ftp.FtpURLConnection.connect(FtpURLConnection.java:70)

 at sun.net.www.protocol.ftp.FtpURLConnection.getInputStream(Compiled Code)

 at
sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.openConnectionCheckRedirects(Com
piled Code)

 at sun.applet.AppletResourceLoader.loadJar(AppletResourceLoader.java:140)

 at sun.applet.AppletPanel.loadJarFiles(Compiled Code)

 at sun.plugin.AppletViewer.loadJarFiles(Compiled Code)

 at sun.applet.AppletPanel.runLoader(Compiled Code)

 at sun.applet.AppletPanel.run(Compiled Code)

 at java.lang.Thread.run(Compiled Code)


BlkXtasy wrote in message <35e41490.89221140@news.boeing.com>...
>My clients must use the Java Plug-In to access the program I'm
>writing.  In all actuality, I notice the Java Plug-In is quite faster.
>It seems to initialize and run faster..I'm impressed with it.
>\/
>
>
>On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 18:00:40 GMT, sean.mcdermott@usa.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> > In my latest applet, I've been using the Java plugin and that works
quite
>>> > well in both browsers...
>>> >
>>>
>>> I already know Swing applets will work if they're signed and we use the
Java
>>> plug-in. The whole point of my posting was that with the release of
Swing,
>>> JavaSoft has moved us to a new era. Now you have to SIGN ALL APPLETS TO
MATTER
>>> WHAT. Remember, before, we only had to sign applets if they attempted to
leave
>>> the sandbox. That's no longer true! Now, anytime you write an applet, if
you
>>> use Swing to do the interface, you have to sign it - period.
>>
>>I've been using Swing 1.0.2 (JFC 1.1?) with IE4 and haven't need to sign
>>*anything*.  Everything works perfectly!  You do get a couple of stack
traces
>>on the Java Console as Swing initializes but these can be ignored.  In
fact,
>>I'm rather impressed with the speed of Swing once it is loaded.  All I do
is
>>include the swingall.jar file in the archive part of the applet tag.
>>
>>I do believe you're last sentance regarding Swing and signing is utter
>>nonsense.
>>
>>
>>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>>http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum
>