🚀 go-pugleaf

I don't think it is proper for Java to use SmallTalk-like "super"
to refer to members defined in superclasses.

C++ and SmallTalk uses a different inheritance mechanism. In
SmallTalk, the member defined in superclasses actually
exists in superclass. SmallTalk uses dynamic inheritance,
therefore, "this" and "super" are different objects.

In C++, there shouldn't be a distinction of objects: an object of
subclass and an object of superclass. It is a single object
viewing in different types: in the superclass and in the subclass.

Languages uses static inheritance usually use scope selector
to decide which memeber (defined in superclass or subclass)
should be used.

The Java Specification at the bottom of page 10 introduces
confusions.

David Shang