🚀 go-pugleaf

>> |> (e.g. assembly, C, C++, insert any
>> |> widely adopted language here), rather than those using the elegant and
>> |> refined tools of the sophisticates (e.g. Smalltalk, Lisp, Prolog, insert
>> |> any language rarely used for commercial applications here) ARE PRODUCING
>> |> ALL THE PRODUCTS!

>Ada, COBOL, FORTRAN, Pascal and others were not intended to be excluded
>from the "widely adopted language" category by their omission.

>and people who program in the languages of the intelligentsia
>are not necessarily better, more productive or making a larger
>contribution to the advancement of the art than those using widely adopted
>languages.  They do seem to have somewhat of a larger chip on their
>shoulders though.

Were these postings meant to be taken as a parody of political 
conservatives and self-proclaimed populists discussing programming 
languages?

....hehe, quite funny!


- Josh









--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jstern
jstern@primenet.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------