🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.java
Article #329

Re: Will Java kill C++?

#329
From: Dogmat
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 23:52
13 lines
1185 bytes
"Alan L. Lovejoy" <alovejoy@concentric.net> wrote

>Self stores methods in slots of the object itself--directly mapping
>an object to its behavior.  Smalltalk stores methods in the class...

Anyone agree with me that the Self approach is conceptually superior?
Note: I am not interested in the pros and cons of the implementation or
the syntax, or the difficulties of managing it, or the dangers of its
abuse. What I am suggesting is, at the conceptual level (i.e., the long
term view), the bottom line is: One of the two is limiting, the other is
not. In Smalltalk, an instance is locked in (unless you go to great
lengths to get around it, and the results can be tragic). In Self, an
instance is free to evolve.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4l990j$c7p@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
References: <3177B2BC.482B@dmu.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: dogmat@aol.com (Dogmat)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++?
Date: 19 Apr 1996 19:52:51 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <4l990j$c7p@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
References: <3177B2BC.482B@dmu.ac.uk>
Reply-To: dogmat@aol.com (Dogmat)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com