Article View: comp.lang.java
Article #329Re: Will Java kill C++?
From: Dogmat
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 23:52
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 23:52
13 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
"Alan L. Lovejoy" <alovejoy@concentric.net> wrote >Self stores methods in slots of the object itself--directly mapping >an object to its behavior. Smalltalk stores methods in the class... Anyone agree with me that the Self approach is conceptually superior? Note: I am not interested in the pros and cons of the implementation or the syntax, or the difficulties of managing it, or the dangers of its abuse. What I am suggesting is, at the conceptual level (i.e., the long term view), the bottom line is: One of the two is limiting, the other is not. In Smalltalk, an instance is locked in (unless you go to great lengths to get around it, and the results can be tragic). In Self, an instance is free to evolve.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4l990j$c7p@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3177B2BC.482B@dmu.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: dogmat@aol.com (Dogmat) Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++? Date: 19 Apr 1996 19:52:51 -0400 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4l990j$c7p@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <3177B2BC.482B@dmu.ac.uk> Reply-To: dogmat@aol.com (Dogmat) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com