Re: Are "super" and "this" different objects?

Article View: comp.lang.java

Article #48

#48

From: Piercarlo Grandi
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:56

6 lines
1222 bytes

Michael-1> In more conventional languages, (like C) the equivalent of
Michael-1> sending a message does not exist.

Michael-2> Yes, it is a waste of time.  I never said the idea of message
Michael-2> sending was new.  Clearly, the form that has existed in
Michael-2> Smalltalk-80 is at least 15 years old.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <yf3buqeitli.fsf@sabi.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!zetnet.co.uk!demon!sabi.demon.co.uk

References:

<1995Oct23.154442.6836@schbbs.mot.com> <47crr3$f5a@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <vwjbuqta4hr.fsf@osfb.aber.ac.uk> <47spvc$or1@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <yf3envfp4hd.fsf@sabi.demon.co.uk> <486v0m$973@gap.cco.caltech.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!zetnet.co.uk!demon!sabi.demon.co.uk
From: piercarl@sabi.demon.co.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.object,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Are "super" and "this" different objects?
Date: 15 Nov 1995 00:56:08 +0000
Organization: Home's where my rucksack's
Sender: piercarl@sabi.demon.co.uk
Message-ID: <yf3buqeitli.fsf@sabi.demon.co.uk>
References: <1995Oct23.154442.6836@schbbs.mot.com>
 <47crr3$f5a@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <vwjbuqta4hr.fsf@osfb.aber.ac.uk>
 <47spvc$or1@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <yf3envfp4hd.fsf@sabi.demon.co.uk>
 <486v0m$973@gap.cco.caltech.edu>
Reply-To: piercarl@sabi.demon.co.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
NNTP-Posting-Host: sabi.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sabi.demon.co.uk
In-reply-to: mklein@alumni.caltech.edu's message of 13 Nov 1995 08:18:30 GMT
X-Disclaimer: Contents reflect my personal views only
Precedence: first-class
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0.12

Reply to Parent Message