Article View: comp.lang.javascript
Article #118Re: Possibly OT. IE6 and background colors..
From: David Mark
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:28
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:28
25 lines
2426 bytes
2426 bytes
On Oct 26, 7:00 am, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote: > Espen Koht wrote: > > In article <1193392329.536778.128...@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, > > David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Verdana is not appropriate for a Web page. 12px Verdana is even less > >> appropriate. Verdana is a relatively large font, which may or may not > >> be legible at 12px. > > > Care to make this argument more coherent? Verdana is designed for > > legibility on computer screens and by all accounts achieves this, even > > at small sizes. > > Exactly. Off the mark actually. > > When looking for a legible small no serif font, we went through a load > of options testing against IE5,6,7 Firefox and safari, and that > particular one came up looking decent. On Windows of course. Users of other operating systems will likely see a different font, which will be smaller than you intended as you based your deezyne on 12px Verdana.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1193398132.303324.27330@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1193389007.23560.0@proxy01.news.clara.net> <1193392329.536778.128210@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <ehk20-118365.11563726102007@nntp-serv.cam.ac.uk> <1193396401.28654.1@proxy00.news.clara.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb3cb,eb18126472a65c40 X-Google-Thread: 102f53,eb18126472a65c40 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb3cb,gid102f53,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript,cam.misc Subject: Re: Possibly OT. IE6 and background colors.. Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:28:52 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 26 Message-ID: <1193398132.303324.27330@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References: <1193389007.23560.0@proxy01.news.clara.net> <1193392329.536778.128210@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <ehk20-118365.11563726102007@nntp-serv.cam.ac.uk> <1193396401.28654.1@proxy00.news.clara.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.33.125.37 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193398132 3661 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2007 11:28:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:28:52 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1193396401.28654.1@proxy00.news.clara.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.33.125.37; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0