🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <15rdkuINNb3f@agate.berkeley.edu> bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Harvey) writes:
>But I wasn't thinking of the case of name conflicts.  Instead, I was thinking
>about the situation in which all variables have distinct names.  In that case,
>as I suggested, the variables available to procedure B under lexical scope
>are a subset of the ones available to it under dynamic scope.  Under lexical
>scope it has the free variables and its own variables; under dynamic scope it
>also has those of procedure A.
>
>This situation is in contrast with what happens in Scheme, where lexical
>scope sometimes gives you access to extra variables, namely, when you use
>a procedure that was defined inside another one, like this:
>
>But Logo doesn't have lambda, and so lexical scope merely restricts the
>available sources of variables.  (Same in C and Pascal.)
[deleted]

This may be a naive question, but here it is for what it's worth: Are
there variants of Logo that use lexical scope?

--d
-- 

dorai@titan.rice.edu   !    It may be that the gulfs will wash us down;
dorai@owlnet.rice.edu  !      it may be we shall touch the Happy Isles.