Article View: comp.lang.logo
Article #66Re: Future of Logo
From: Brian Harvey
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 23:28
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 23:28
16 lines
1373 bytes
1373 bytes
rrogers@cs.washington.edu (Richard Rogers) writes:
> [C] also encourages the good practise of passing
^^^^^^^^^^
>things the procedure needs to it as parameters.
I hate languages that "encourage" (i.e., force, by omitting capabilities)
someone's idea of what's "good" for me. This is another of those
religious issues that we won't agree about. I think Pascal is not only
an incredibly bad programming language, but it's also a phenomenal
exercise in arrogance, because of how it "encourages" things.
P.S. About lists vs. other data structures: Early versions of Logo (before
there were microcomputers) had arrays. Some recent versions have arrays.
The reliance on lists as the only data aggregate in most microcomputer
versions wasn't a matter of principle; it was the result of not being able
to fit everything into a 64K Apple.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15po64INNqff@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU!bhReferences:
<1992Aug5.100121.28641@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <15omhaINNgvr@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Aug5.203847.20530@beaver.cs.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU!bh From: bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Harvey) Newsgroups: comp.lang.logo Subject: Re: Future of Logo Date: 5 Aug 1992 23:28:04 GMT Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 16 Message-ID: <15po64INNqff@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <1992Aug5.100121.28641@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <15omhaINNgvr@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Aug5.203847.20530@beaver.cs.washington.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.cs.berkeley.edu