Re: A different view of the goto controversy

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #1270

#1270

From: Dave Jones
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 1990 20:40

11 lines
865 bytes

From article <6939:May1702:16:3190@stealth.acf.nyu.edu), by brnstnd@stealth.acf.nyu.edu:

)  ...
) What control structures do we need to express all the crossed jumps that
) come up in practice? I don't know. I do know that the energy wasted on
) goto arguments would be much more fruitfully applied to answering this
) question.


All this was settled long ago. All the 'energy wasted' would
be better spent on virtually anything else.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13087@goofy.megatest.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!decwrl!megatest!djones

References: <6939:May1702:16:3190@stealth.acf.nyu.edu)

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!decwrl!megatest!djones
From: djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: A different view of the goto controversy
Message-ID: <13087@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jun 90 20:40:19 GMT
References: <6939:May1702:16:3190@stealth.acf.nyu.edu)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Megatest Corporation, San Jose, Ca
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message