Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #1281Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
From: George Nelan
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 1990 16:14
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 1990 16:14
19 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
In article <4574@castle.ed.ac.uk>, nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) writes:
| In article <915@gistdev.gist.com>, flint@gistdev (Flint Pellett) writes:
| > <C vs. Fortran stuff>
|
| I believe I once saw mention of a third computer programming language.
|
| One which wasn't C, and wasn't FORTRAN either.
|
| Might have been my imagination.
|
| [ 1/2 :-) ]
|
So, can you provide any pointers to this alleged third computer programming
language? Also, does it have higher-order functions?
--
George Nelan, ERC 252, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA, 85287
INET: nelan@enuxha.eas.asu.edu
UUCP: ...{allegra,{ames,husc6,rutgers}!ncar}!noao!asuvax!nelan
QOTD: Don't have a cow (it's still the twentieth century schizoid) man.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<909@enuxha.eas.asu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!enuxha!nelanReferences:
<1633@dinl.mmc.UUCP> <915@gistdev.gist.com> <4574@castle.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!enuxha!nelan From: nelan@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (George Nelan) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?) Summary: Likely Story Nick Message-ID: <909@enuxha.eas.asu.edu> Date: 11 Jun 90 16:14:16 GMT References: <1633@dinl.mmc.UUCP> <915@gistdev.gist.com> <4574@castle.ed.ac.uk> Organization: Arizona State Univ, Tempe Lines: 19