Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #1430Re: Efficient Fortran
From: Greg Lindahl
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 1990 13:58
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 1990 13:58
13 lines
1064 bytes
1064 bytes
In article <2426@l.cc.purdue.edu> cik@l.cc.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes: >The idea of open subroutines, a cross between macros and inlining, existed >at the time of Fortran I. So what do open subroutines give you, performance-wise, that inlining doesn't? I believe several posters explained to you a few days ago that many compiler/linkers provide inlining these days. However, you never seem to respond to anyone who has a simple, existing way to do what you want. -- "In fact you should not be involved in IRC." -- Phil Howard
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug3.135805.24472@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8fReferences:
<ARS4N0F@xds13.ferranti.com> <8E+4_83@ggpc2.ferranti.com> <2426@l.cc.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8f From: gl8f@astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Efficient Fortran Message-ID: <1990Aug3.135805.24472@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 3 Aug 90 13:58:05 GMT References: <ARS4N0F@xds13.ferranti.com> <8E+4_83@ggpc2.ferranti.com> <2426@l.cc.purdue.edu> Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia Lines: 13