Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #1533Re: := versus ==
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 1990 01:35
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 1990 01:35
13 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
In article <2538:Aug1914:03:0790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: > Right now, Q accepts both *p/&x and p^/x@. I dig the p^ bit, but x@ is a bit odd (@ is used in other contexts, such as some assemblers, as an indirection operator). Since you're overloading ^ (with xor, no?), why not just allow * and & postfix? It's no worse. What about "p^-3"? Is that (p^)-3 or p^(-3). -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U` peter@ferranti.com (currently not working) peter@hackercorp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<+KB5WSF@ggpc2.ferranti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peterReferences:
<7H+4AM6@xds13.ferranti.com> <3989@rtifs1.UUCP> <:1=4K26@ggpc2.ferranti.com> <2538:Aug1914:03:0790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: := versus == Message-ID: <+KB5WSF@ggpc2.ferranti.com> Date: 20 Aug 90 01:35:33 GMT References: <7H+4AM6@xds13.ferranti.com> <3989@rtifs1.UUCP> <:1=4K26@ggpc2.ferranti.com> <2538:Aug1914:03:0790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 8