Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #1556Re: UNIX semantics do permit full support for asynchronous I/O
From: merriman
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 1990 22:07
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 1990 22:07
9 lines
1029 bytes
1029 bytes
In article <1990Aug29.170931.10853@terminator.cc.umich.edu>, rsc@merit.edu (Richard Conto) writes: > > Make it simpler. Have a routine that requests an I/O operation. Another > routine that can check it's status. A way of specifying a routine to be > called when the I/O operation completes might be yet another option. Sure sounds like VMS QIO calls.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31445.26dc0466@ccavax.camb.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!ccavax!merrimanReferences:
<126800008@.Prime.COM> <60345@lanl.gov> <1990Aug21.223350.7595@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <11576:Aug2503:18:3790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <27619@nuchat.UUCP> <1990Aug29.170931.10853@terminator.cc.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!ccavax!merriman From: merriman@ccavax.camb.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: UNIX semantics do permit full support for asynchronous I/O Message-ID: <31445.26dc0466@ccavax.camb.com> Date: 29 Aug 90 22:07:34 GMT References: <126800008@.Prime.COM> <60345@lanl.gov> <1990Aug21.223350.7595@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <11576:Aug2503:18:3790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <27619@nuchat.UUCP> <1990Aug29.170931.10853@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc. Lines: 9