Re: dynamic symbol binding

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #1692

#1692

From: John Porter
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 1990 04:52

6 lines
729 bytes

Maybe I'm just stupid, but it seems rather obvious to me that C (and other
languages) permit just such binding, in that all variables of storage class
'auto' are dynamic, and therefore the symbols bound to them are the symbols
under discussion.

--jp

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2630@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!umbc3!gmuvax2!2113av

References: <1653@seti.inria.fr> <14150@goofy.megatest.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!umbc3!gmuvax2!2113av
From: 2113av@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (John Porter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: dynamic symbol binding
Message-ID: <2630@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 90 04:52:08 GMT
References: <1653@seti.inria.fr> <14150@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Reply-To: 2113av@gmuvax2.UUCP (John Porter)
Organization: George Mason Univ. Fairfax, Va.
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message