Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #1962Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
From: Jim Giles
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:18
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:18
17 lines
1275 bytes
1275 bytes
From article <11854:Nov723:28:2490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>, by brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein): > In article <5224@lanl.gov> jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes: > [...] > As I said, the compiler checks the validity of the .h file against each > c file when it compiles the .c file. If the vendor has sent along a .o, > then obviously the compiler has compiled the vendor's .c, so it had the > chance to check at that point. Well, as I said, mistakes happen. You might have compiled your main code with (say) version x.y of their .h files. They might have sent you copies of version a.b of their .o files. The first tool that _can_ test this kind of mismatch is the loader. The fact that version x.y .h files match the version x.y .o files doesn't help. Clearly, all you have found is an even _more_ efficient way for my loader test to be implemented - compare version numbers. J. Giles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5240@lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!jlgReferences:
<11854:Nov723:28:2490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!jlg From: jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX Message-ID: <5240@lanl.gov> Date: 8 Nov 90 00:18:47 GMT References: <11854:Nov723:28:2490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Organization: Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, N.M. Lines: 17