🚀 go-pugleaf

No technical content.

In article <6164@lanl.gov> jlg@lanl.gov (Jim Giles) writes:
> It is impossible to argue with someone that _never_ sticks to the
> technical issues.

I resent the implication, as would anyone who has tried to contribute
something to the network.

> Interestingly, in a recent article, he has insisted that only technical
> content should be allowed on the thread. 

The thought might cross your mind that *you* have failed to stick to
technical issues.

The thought might cross your mind that I am sick of how you repeatedly
pervert the issues at hand.

The thought might cross your mind that your perversions depend heavily
on the way that you can misparaphrase and misquote previous articles,
and that in a technical thread, perhaps such paraphrases would stick out
as personal attacks.

The thought might even cross your mind that I am trying to improve the
quality of this group.

> Since he is always the first
> to leave technical content for invective, the request is a hollow one.

I resent that statement. I also hope that you will participate in the
Technical threads without violating their spirit.

---Dan