Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #2438Languages for numerical programming (was Fortran etc.)
From: Bill Poser
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 1990 20:22
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 1990 20:22
12 lines
1250 bytes
1250 bytes
If you numerical programming folk like Fortran because of its facilities for handling multi-dimensional arrays and builtin complex numbers, how come you don't use APL? APL has been around a good long time, exists for quite a few machines, and makes Fortran's mathematical facilities look like a joke. I'm curious as to whether the use of Fortran rather than APL is a matter of tradition (together with the fact that until recently APL has used a special character set - this, of course, wouldn't have been terribly difficult to change if there had been sufficient interest), or whether numerical programmers have seriously considered it and rejected it. What say you? Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16781@csli.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!lll-winken!unixhub!shelby!csli!poserReferences:
<13457@chaph.usc.edu> <8960031@hpfcso.HP.COM> <1990Dec7.174243.29683@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!lll-winken!unixhub!shelby!csli!poser From: poser@csli.Stanford.EDU (Bill Poser) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Languages for numerical programming (was Fortran etc.) Message-ID: <16781@csli.Stanford.EDU> Date: 7 Dec 90 20:22:59 GMT References: <13457@chaph.usc.edu> <8960031@hpfcso.HP.COM> <1990Dec7.174243.29683@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> Reply-To: poser@csli.stanford.edu (Bill Poser) Organization: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford U. Lines: 12