Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #2500Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work
From: Marc Roussel
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 01:12
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 1990 01:12
9 lines
848 bytes
848 bytes
In article <X2uRT4w163w@mantis.UUCP> mathew@mantis.UUCP (mathew) writes:
>Common Lisp's
>great for numerical stuff... if only it were faster!
Now that's an intriguing comment... I never thought of Lisp as a
numerical language. What facilities does it provide?
Marc R. Roussel
mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Dec12.011232.11101@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca!mrousselReferences:
<1990Dec5.185852.5191@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> <X2uRT4w163w@mantis.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca!mroussel From: mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) Subject: Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work Message-ID: <1990Dec12.011232.11101@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> Organization: Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto References: <1990Dec5.185852.5191@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> <X2uRT4w163w@mantis.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 90 01:12:32 GMT