Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #2529Re: Lisp vs APL for numeric work (was Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work)
From: Only 5 more shopping days until ...
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 1990 23:51
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 1990 23:51
11 lines
831 bytes
831 bytes
barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes: >It's been a long time since I've used APL, but I don't recall it having a >way to specify single- vs. double-precision. Just change quad-CT or )FUZZ for you APL\360 fans. I still have my primer. -- Andrew Scott Beals abeals@autodesk.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<abeals.661737082@melange>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!autodesk!melange!abealsReferences:
<13615@chaph.usc.edu> <1990Dec12.175323.8958@Think.COM> <1990Dec19.201059.16458@bernina.ethz.ch> <1990Dec20.050320.23027@Think.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!autodesk!melange!abeals From: abeals@autodesk.com (Only 5 more shopping days until Christmas) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Lisp vs APL for numeric work (was Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work) Message-ID: <abeals.661737082@melange> Date: 20 Dec 90 23:51:22 GMT References: <13615@chaph.usc.edu> <1990Dec12.175323.8958@Think.COM> <1990Dec19.201059.16458@bernina.ethz.ch> <1990Dec20.050320.23027@Think.COM> Sender: news@Autodesk.COM Lines: 11