🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <19468:Dec2100:23:0790@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>X-Original-Subject: Re: Complexity of syntax
>
>In article <1990Dec19.222059.6878@mathrt0.math.chalmers.se> augustss@cs.chalmers.se (Lennart Augustsson) writes:
>> To see the difference just try to write a function
>> that does function composition.
>> I claim that this is impossible to do in a portable way.
>
>Okay. (What follows isn't tested but you'll get the idea.)
>
>[ idea, which probably will work, deleted ]
>

I think this is not what Lennart wanted. He wanted something like:

  extern int f(), g();
  int (*fg)();
  ...
  fg = f;
  (*fg)(x);            /* executes f(x) */
  fg = compose (f,g);
  (*fg)(x);            /* should execute f(g(x)) */

That is: he just wants to use the result of compose just like any other
pointer to function, so one needs not to known whether it is a real function
or a composed one. In Dan's code one must made this disctinction.

By the way when reading Lennarts article, he gave me more or less the idea
that this compising is possible in ALGOL68, but I am affraid it isn't.
-- 
   _ _ 
  / U |  Dolf Grunbauer  Tel: +31 55 433233 Internet dolf@idca.tds.philips.nl
 /__'<   Philips Information Systems        UUCP     ...!mcsun!philapd!dolf
88  |_\  If you are granted one wish do you know what to wish for right now ?