🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <21642@yunexus.YorkU.CA> oz@yunexus.yorku.ca (Ozan Yigit) writes:
> No, they were not C functions, therefore unlike other attempts, they were
> [and still are] irrelevant to the discussion.

Ah. Someone with a name you might recognize posted a C++ solution near
the beginning of this discussion. His composable functions were not C
functions, so you are saying that his solution was irrelevant.

> We have noted that by that amusing re-definition,
> C ``has'' Fortran.

Fortran is not a semantic feature. It is a computer language.

Your notes have been exceedingly repetitious, largely incorrect, and
insulting to (among other people) the man who designed C++. I don't
think that anyone wants to associate himself with your royal ``we.''

I want this group to be a useful source of technical information,
not boring arguments. But I haven't seen a new observation in this
discussion for more than a week. So I'm giving up on this thread, and I
suggest that others do likewise. It's not my problem if Ozan wants to
continue tossing insults at Bell Labs language designers.

---Dan