🚀 go-pugleaf

browns@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com (Stan Brown) writes:
> > arndt@zyx.ZYX.SE (Arndt Jonasson) writes:
[about annoying program output]
> >> 	1 files were copied
> >> when it should have been:
> >> 	1 file was copied

>        printf("%d file%s copied\n", nfiles, nfiles=1?" was":"s were");
> This assumes that "0 files were copied" is correct.  For that reason, and
> because it's less susceptible to bonehead errors like mine, I prefer the
> second form, which gives "files copied: 0", "files copied: 1",...

Your second form ("files copied: n") is better for another reason: It will
prevent much tearing of hair if anyone attempts to translate the messages
to another natural language.

The ?: singular/plural hacks calling printf are cute for programs which
don't travel much, but they don't translate.  There's generally no hope for
any sort of automated rework, either.
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd       Boulder, CO   (303)449-2870
   ...But is it art?