Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #2849Re: Kolstad's Konjecture
From: Bill Poser
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 1991 04:07
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 1991 04:07
9 lines
987 bytes
987 bytes
In article <14378@ulysses.att.com> kpv@ulysses.att.com (Phong Vo[drew]) writes: >csh didn't make it because it wasn't compatible to sh. Hmm. I certainly don't know the statistics, but I don't think I've EVER met anybody outside of AT&T who uses sh rather than csh. I used sh when I was at Bell, and almost immediately switched to csh when I came to Stanford. Is it really correct to say that "csh didn't make it"? Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17937@csli.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!shelby!csli!poserReferences:
<1991Feb22.211643.12151@linus.mitre.org> <1991Feb25.184544.20726@convex.com> <14378@ulysses.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!shelby!csli!poser From: poser@csli.Stanford.EDU (Bill Poser) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Kolstad's Konjecture Message-ID: <17937@csli.Stanford.EDU> Date: 27 Feb 91 04:07:32 GMT References: <1991Feb22.211643.12151@linus.mitre.org> <1991Feb25.184544.20726@convex.com> <14378@ulysses.att.com> Organization: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford U. Lines: 9