🚀 go-pugleaf

daw@cbnewsh.att.com (David Wolverton) writes:

>> [discussion of pluralization deleted]

>As an addendum to this discussion, you might consider how these sorts
>of problems occur when a program is internationalized (that is, converted
>into another language) (that is, a human language other than English).
>A truly "world class" (pun intended) programmer will consider such
>issues during development.

>Assuming that you pull the 1st argument out into a #define in a header
>or a text file somewhere, at least the following other issues come up:
>        1. How to print the correct currency symbol?
>        2. How to format values > 999?
>        3. How to format the date?
>        4. Whether, in a language other than English, would
>	the message read more sensibly with the second and
>	third printf() arguments reversed?	

Acting as a Lisp gadfly, my response would be "Too bad you don't
program in a language with a real object system, in which the solution
would be to have dates, currency amounts and so forth each know how to
form their own printed representation.  One would then have subtypes
of DATE such as EUROPEAN-DATE, and subtypes of CURRENCY-AMOUNT such as
RUBLE, DUETSCH-MARK and DOLLAR."

Such an implementation has other wins as well.  For instance, if
currency amounts are represented as numbers, it gets very inconvenient
to represent $19.99.

Of course, one often wants more light-weight representations of such
things, in which case the appropriate thing to do is program in an
object-oriented manner even if you don't use explicit objects.
--
John Burger                                               john@mitre.org

"You ever think about .signature files? I mean, do we really need them?"
  - alt.andy.rooney