🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Feb26.161256.14202@hq.demos.su> avg@hq.demos.su (Vadim Antonov) writes:
> Got the point? I've spent a hell lot of time making bilingual release
> of Unix (Russian and English) and finally I think it would be better
> to have a standard function for producing plural forms, something like:
> 	printf("%d file%s copied\n", n, plural(n, ":s", "english"));
> 	printf("%d fail%s skopirovan%s\n", n, plural(n, "ov::a", "russian"),
> 					      plural(n, "o::o", "russian"));

In my forthcoming error-message library:

  %1 file%{%1%(e-plural)} copied%
  %1 fail%{%1%(r1-plural)} skopirovan%{%1%(r2-plural)}%

where e-plural is ``%_1%_%=%?s:'' and r{1,2}-plural are something like
``%_%d1%_%-10%_%/10%_%*%-%d1%_%=%?ov:%!%?{5%_%<%?a:}:'' Okay, okay, so
the interface still needs quite a bit of work, but this sort of
internationalization can certainly be done within configuration files.

---Dan