Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #3009Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
From: Larry Campbell
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1991 13:14
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1991 13:14
13 lines
1311 bytes
1311 bytes
In article <25381:Mar1221:07:3891@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: -In article <609@optima.cs.arizona.edu> gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) writes: -> Why should a programming language be expected to catch this type of -> error at compile time, and not some other class of errors? Why are -> type errors so special? Given the difficulty of completely testing all possible functions in any large software product, the difference between catching the error at compile time and catching it at runtime is the difference between YOU discovering the error during development and the CUSTOMER discovering the error in the field. -- Larry Campbell The Boston Software Works, Inc., 120 Fulton Street campbell@redsox.bsw.com Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (USA)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Mar17.131413.13312@redsox.bsw.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!hsdndev!husc6!redsox!campbellReferences:
<609@optima.cs.arizona.edu> <25381:Mar1221:07:3891@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!hsdndev!husc6!redsox!campbell From: campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3) Message-ID: <1991Mar17.131413.13312@redsox.bsw.com> Date: 17 Mar 91 13:14:13 GMT References: <609@optima.cs.arizona.edu> <25381:Mar1221:07:3891@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Reply-To: campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) Organization: The Boston Software Works, Inc. Lines: 13