Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #3097Re: Algol 68
From: David Gudeman
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 22:25
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1991 22:25
21 lines
1252 bytes
1252 bytes
In article <3151.9103201408@olympus.cs.hull.ac.uk> Rob Turner writes: ]I always remember being told about various advanced programming ]features at university, and, invariably, Algol 68 would have each of ]those features. That is likely because the advanced features that were discussed were those that happen to by in Algol68. There are lots of features known today that weren't even thought of in 68. ]I think the language was way ahead of its time. People were not ready ]for it. I think it was a good language that should have gotten more attention than it did, but I don't think it was because it was ahead of its time. There are a lot of personal, political, business, and economical reasons why some languages become popular and some don't. How good a language is, is one of the least important considerations. -- David Gudeman gudeman@cs.arizona.edu noao!arizona!gudeman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<993@optima.cs.arizona.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!arizona!gudemanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!arizona!gudeman From: gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Algol 68 Message-ID: <993@optima.cs.arizona.edu> Date: 21 Mar 91 22:25:51 GMT Sender: news@cs.arizona.edu Lines: 21