🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <21189:Mar2521:55:0691@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>, brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes...

> 
>I understand: It's a ``nuisance'' when someone refuses to accept the
>dogma of current computer science.
   [examples of the truth a'la Dan Bernstein deleted to save space]
>someone tells the truth as he sees it, then yes, folks, I guess I'm
>Ozan's sort of nuisance.
> 

Only when the truth as you see it includes statements like:

  >Doug, you have made nothing of yourself in this newsgroup but a nuisance
  >for at least the last few months.                                     


>and what should appear in future languages. I still wish it were
>possible to start a conversation here about pointers and arrays without
>having it degenerate into a series of religious arguments. It's not.
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Would you please come up with a better phrase for the types of
"conversations" which erupt here?  You'll give religion a bad name.  :-)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
      Walter Rutherford
       P.O. Box 83273          \ /    Computers are NOT intelligent;
   Fairbanks, Alaska 99708    - X -
                               / \      they just think they are!
   fnwlr1@acad3.alaska.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------